<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

  <channel>

  
  <title>Qt DevNet forums: The Lounge 1276630770**  </title>
  <link>http://qt-project.org/forums/viewforum/7/</link>
  <description>RSS feed for latest posts in The Lounge</description>
  <copyright>Copyright 2012 Qt Developer Network</copyright>
  <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
  <generator>ExpressionEngine v2.3.1 http://expressionengine.com/</generator>
  <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 21:39:30 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <atom:link href="http://qt-project.org/feeds/all_forums/7" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
  
  
  
        <item>
            <title>[Poll] Which direction should Qt Quick 2.x development take?</title>
            <link>http://qt-project.org/forums/viewreply/86552</link>
            <author>jdavet</author>
            <description><![CDATA[This poll is impossible to answer, because it lists multiple things that are fundamental requirements as mutually exclusive choices :&#45;)

	Yeah, the forum does not support multiple&#45;answer polls. So you&#8217;ll need to prioritize&#8230; :&#45;)

	The &#8220;right way&#8221; to do this would actually require setting up a special survey web page, and allow the audience to rate each feature on a scale like this:

3. Binary QML &#8230; Adding this feature right now (for Qt 5.1) would be&#8230; harmful  not useful  nice to have  very useful  vital &#8230; Adding this feature eventually (at some point in the future) would be&#8230; harmful  not useful  nice to have  very useful  vital 

	Doing it as a proper survey would also allow correlating the results with different user groups, by adding questions like&#8230;

What will you use Qt Quick for primarily, in the forseable future? &#8230;  freeware or open&#45;source project(s) &#8230;  commercial software 

What&#8217;s your experience level with Qt Quick? &#8230;  don&#8217;t know much about it yet &#8230;  read lots of documentation, but didn&#8217;t get my hands dirty yet &#8230;  already experimented with it somewhat &#8230;  wrote one or more small apps with it (or ported existing ones) &#8230;  successfully wrote a large, complex application with it (or ported an existing one) &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;. &amp;rarr; type of application:  &#8230;  helped to design/develop Qt Quick itself 

	But for this to happen, the Qt Project (or Nokia or Digia) would have to get behind it and do it as an official survey.]]></description>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1f839cb9e72eb5b712923de0739b07fe</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 19:41:31 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
  
        <item>
            <title>[Moved]Who want join me to start a QtQuick project</title>
            <link>http://qt-project.org/forums/viewreply/86072</link>
            <author>Vass</author>
            <description><![CDATA[I think if you describe your projects in general terms at least, you will get more feedback.]]></description>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">799f4f37236a33cba7f0f93ef4260d63</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 13:28:21 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
  
        <item>
            <title>[Moved]Who want join me to start a QtQuick project</title>
            <link>http://qt-project.org/forums/viewthread/17330</link>
            <author>leafaku</author>
            <description><![CDATA[Hi guys,

	I have a opensource project  in meego/symbian and I need someone to join me.
If you skill in qml,javascript,git please contact me I will give you detail.

	leafaku@gmail.com
Best Regards,
Leaf 

	[Moved: Because QtQuick is a technical forum. Your topic is not technical. /Vass]]]></description>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">29afb73c10050b7549d4f6fbc4f4f363</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 13:06:24 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
  
        <item>
            <title>Some good news for Symbian ?</title>
            <link>http://qt-project.org/forums/viewreply/86044</link>
            <author>john_god</author>
            <description><![CDATA[After almost a year of starvation, and a profit loss of 1,7 billion in the first Q3 of 2012, Nokia 
is NOW starting to sell the N9 in the US, only NOW ? And they also will sell the Pure View in the 
US has it was not initially planned ?
What a bunch of retarded people the guys running Nokia.
Nokia was in the past a sane company, driving inovation, driving good politics towards 
the opensource comunity and the developers. The new Nokia envisioned by thoose retard people is a scary thing, it&#8217;s all about not respecting the consumer, nor the developers, it&#8217;s about having the best phone in the world but not putting it to sell because it&#8217;s not Windows Phone, and I will stop for now.  
I apolagize because my post it&#8217;s all about rating and it&#8217;s getting nowhere. My respects and 
salute to all true Nokia and Qt workers, as for those running Nokia what a bunch of retard people.]]></description>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">b8faa8a3fd45aa5026299a8133df4a00</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 08:21:24 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
  
        <item>
            <title>Some good news for Symbian ?</title>
            <link>http://qt-project.org/forums/viewthread/17304</link>
            <author>Jayakrishnan.M</author>
            <description><![CDATA[http://www.phonenews.com/nokia&#45;selling&#45;n9&#45;united&#45;states&#45;20341/]]></description>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1896806ccac2bc54313198a46f2ce675</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 13:06:31 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
  
        <item>
            <title>Parallex View in Qt</title>
            <link>http://qt-project.org/forums/viewreply/85971</link>
            <author>sierdzio</author>
            <description><![CDATA[What do you mean? QML is part of Qt.

	Anyway, you can take a look at QGraphicsView [qt&#45;project.org] and/ or QGLWidget [qt&#45;project.org].]]></description>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4afe7d8128ad02ade52ff66f3a566d58</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 09:15:37 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
  
        <item>
            <title>Parallex View in Qt</title>
            <link>http://qt-project.org/forums/viewthread/17292</link>
            <author>Jags</author>
            <description><![CDATA[Hi Everyone,I need to implement the parallexview in Qt.I have to move the three screens in background layer by layer continously.I have found that it is available in Qml but for my project i have to use it in Qt.So Please help.]]></description>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">14cf7876c53c2a4f2deaf018e11119e7</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 03:16:39 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
  
        <item>
            <title>Does Qt need a modern C++ GUI API?</title>
            <link>http://qt-project.org/forums/viewreply/85802</link>
            <author>Lukas Geyer</author>
            <description><![CDATA[Yes, using a preprocessor is a possibility.

	But let&#8217;s take a look at the idea behind: we are adding specific language extensions because the requested functionality is not supported, which are then translated by a seperate tool into native code.

	If we now extend your example to the correct use of properties (which require the use of property() and setProperty(), as there is no such thing as a property in C++) or a more declarative way to describe a hierarchy of components using key&#45;value assignment (as requested and suggested on the mailing list), basically everything on the list for an advanced GUI API (and everything that distincts QtQuick from the already existing, hardware&#45;accelerated Graphics View API) we end up adding specific extensions and then, although having a native API, in creating and implementing our QtQuick components using those language extensions &#8211; a specific meta&#45;programming language front&#45;end &#8211; which is then translated into native back&#45;end code by a seperate tool. What we implement in native code is the required supporting code, like constructors, destructors, operators, memory management and so forth.

	If you bring this to a head, you&#8217;ll end up exactly where we are right now. We have a specific meta&#45;programming front&#45;end language, QML, which is then translated by a seperate tool, the declarative engine, into a native representation (no, QML is not interpreted, it is translated into a native representation and no, V8 does not interpret JavaScript, beeing a just&#45;in&#45;time compiler it produces run&#45;time optimized machine code, which is then executed). In both cases you will have to (learn and) use a specific front&#45;end language (with different aesthetics) which is not C++.

	You&#8217;ve already been told that a byte&#45;code compiler for QML is possible, partially done and possibly integrated in Qt 5.1 if there is a strong momentum from the community.]]></description>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">740f1737818dc9455347ae38465b0bc7</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 14:40:03 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
  
        <item>
            <title>Blackberry + Qt</title>
            <link>http://qt-project.org/forums/viewreply/84584</link>
            <author>ZapB</author>
            <description><![CDATA[Blackberry is being actively developed and supported. Qt 4.8 works out of the box as does the development version of Qt5.

	See http://qt&#45;project.org/wiki/Building_Qt_5_for_the_Playbook for more information on getting up and running with Qt5 manually. Or you can download a binary SDK from https://github.com/blackberry/Qt/downloads

	You can even use QtQuick2 on Blackberry platforms :)]]></description>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2b861f19a9ab5b90183f0dfccccba6f3</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 15:34:01 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
  
        <item>
            <title>Blackberry + Qt</title>
            <link>http://qt-project.org/forums/viewthread/16878</link>
            <author>qtrahul</author>
            <description><![CDATA[What will be the future of this ?]]></description>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">f0357f999e357c927e470466c93fb78a</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 11:38:10 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
  

  </channel>
</rss>
